A written, ongoing plan for accumulating wealth before retirement and drawing it tax-efficiently afterward. For incorporated professionals, the strategy looks different than for employees — both versions covered below.
Retirement planning, properly done, isn't a calculator output or a number on a one-page summary. It's a written, evolving plan that addresses three questions:
How do you want to live? Geography, lifestyle, support for family, charitable goals, travel, hobbies, healthcare assumptions.
How will it be funded? Sources of income (government benefits, pension, withdrawals from accounts and corporations), expected investment returns, inflation assumptions, tax considerations.
How does it adjust as things change? Markets fluctuate, tax rules change, health changes, family situations change. The plan needs to be flexible enough to respond.
A real retirement plan covers all three. Most "plans" produced by financial software only cover the second one — and even then, often only in simple form.
What we build is a written document that lays out the targeted lifestyle, the funding strategy, the assumptions behind it, and the framework for ongoing review. Reviewed annually at minimum. Updated when life or the rules change.
For employees, individuals, and self-employed Albertans without a corporation, retirement planning centres on coordinated use of personal accounts and government benefits.
The right mix of accounts is highly individual, but most Albertans should have some combination of:
RRSP — tax-deductible contributions, tax-deferred growth, taxable withdrawals. Best when current income is taxed higher than expected retirement income.
TFSA — no deduction going in, tax-free growth, tax-free withdrawals. Best for everyone with contribution room — there's almost no scenario where TFSA contributions don't help.
First Home Savings Account (FHSA) — for those who haven't bought a home, blends RRSP and TFSA features. Tax-deductible contributions, tax-free growth, tax-free withdrawals for a qualifying home purchase.
Non-registered accounts — for amounts beyond registered limits. Less tax-efficient on annual income but flexible on withdrawal timing.
Spousal RRSPs — for income-splitting opportunities when one spouse will retire with higher income than the other.
The contribution priority shifts over a career. Early on, RRSPs and FHSAs usually take precedence for the immediate tax deduction. Mid-career, TFSAs become more valuable as they compound. Late-career, the focus shifts to tax-efficient withdrawal planning rather than further contributions. We bring this together as part of a broader personal financial plan.
The Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security can both be deferred past their default start dates. Most Albertans default to taking them at 65, which is often the wrong answer.
For CPP:
Taking it at 60 reduces benefits by 36% versus age 65
Taking it at 70 increases benefits by 42% versus age 65
The "break-even" age for deferring from 65 to 70 is somewhere in the late 70s to early 80s, depending on assumptions
For Albertans in good health with longevity in the family, deferring CPP to 70 often delivers materially more lifetime income
For OAS:
Taking it at 65 (default) or deferring up to age 70 increases benefits by 36% if deferred to 70
OAS has clawback provisions for higher-income retirees (currently kicking in around $90K and fully clawed back by ~$148K in 2026 — these thresholds adjust annually)
The decision interacts with planned withdrawal strategy and any pension income
A common misconception: people think they need to start CPP and OAS as soon as they're eligible "to get their money's worth." For longevity-favourable Albertans, the opposite is usually true. The deferral builds a meaningful annuitized income stream that lasts as long as you do — valuable for tail-end longevity risk.
We model both versions when we build the plan, so the decision is based on your specific situation rather than the default assumption.
The order in which you withdraw from accounts in retirement materially affects your lifetime tax cost. Common approaches:
Defer registered withdrawals as long as possible. RRSPs grow tax-sheltered — withdrawing earlier means losing that shelter. RRIF minimum withdrawals start at 71, but you can take earlier if it's tax-efficient.
Use non-registered first, where possible. Non-registered accounts are taxed annually anyway; drawing them down first means more of your tax-sheltered accounts keep compounding.
TFSA last (usually). TFSA growth is fully tax-free; using it last preserves the longest tax-free compounding window.
Pension income splitting. Once you turn 65, eligible pension income (including RRIF withdrawals) can be split with a spouse for tax efficiency. Material savings for couples in different brackets.
CPP and OAS timing. As discussed above.
The right strategy depends on your specific account balances, expected expenses, marginal tax rates over time, and the assumed time horizon. Generic rules of thumb miss too much. Modeling the actual numbers for your situation is the work.
A retirement plan that assumes 2% inflation will look very different from a plan that assumes 4%. The last few years have shown that inflation assumptions matter more than people thought. We model a range of inflation scenarios — not just the best case — to make sure the plan holds up under realistic conditions.
For incorporated professionals and business owners, retirement planning becomes layered with corporate-personal coordination. The strategy generally looks like this:
Build retirement wealth through both personal and corporate structures:
Personal: RRSP, TFSA, spousal RRSP, FHSA — same as non-incorporated, with the contribution room driven by your T4 salary
Corporate: Retained earnings in passive investments, Individual Pension Plans (IPPs), corporate-owned life insurance with cash value, possibly corporate-owned investment portfolios with strong tax positioning
The interplay matters. Drawing all corporate compensation as dividends generates no RRSP room and no IPP eligibility. Drawing some as salary creates RRSP and IPP capacity. Your accountant runs the compensation math year-to-year; we make sure the long-term planning implications stay in view.
Learn more about Individual Pension Plans →
Learn more about Corporate-Owned Life Insurance →
Learn more about Tax-Integrated Strategy →
This is where incorporated retirement planning becomes substantially different from personal retirement planning. The corporation needs a wind-down strategy.
Key elements:
Reducing or stopping new salary/dividend income as active work tapers off
Adjusting personal cash flow to be funded from accumulated corporate and personal assets rather than ongoing income
Triggering the IPP — typically converting to pension payments or commuting to a Locked-In Retirement Account
Tax-efficient extraction of corporate retained earnings — through some combination of dividends (using up dividend tax credits), salary (preserving RRSP room until you stop), and capital dividends (when CDA balance is available)
Coordinating the wind-down with CPP and OAS timing so the tax brackets you're paying in stay efficient
A common situation: an incorporated professional retiring at 65 with $1.5M in corporate retained earnings, $400K in personal RRSPs, $200K in TFSAs, and a partner with their own assets and CPP entitlement. The right wind-down strategy depends on:
The corporation's tax position (passive income, small business deduction status, GRIP balance, CDA balance)
The professional's personal tax position
The partner's situation
Expected withdrawal needs
Time horizon and health considerations
Estate planning intentions
Done well, the difference between an optimized wind-down and a default approach can be hundreds of thousands of dollars over the retirement period. Done poorly, the corporation pays unnecessary tax, the personal tax bill jumps, and OAS clawback eats into income that was supposed to be available. Coordinating this requires tax-integrated planning across the corporation and the household, which is part of what we own as planners.
We coordinate with your accountant on the year-to-year tax mechanics. What we own is the multi-decade strategy.
Once the corporation is largely wound down (or in some cases, kept open with reduced activity for ongoing tax flexibility), retirement strategy moves toward:
Optimizing CPP and OAS timing — same considerations as personal retirement planning, but with more flexibility because you control the income mix from the corporation
Managing RRIF withdrawals starting at 71
Coordinating drawdowns across all accounts to minimize lifetime tax
Estate planning execution — corporate-owned life insurance, CDA strategy, estate equalization (covered separately on the estate planning page)
Charitable giving structures where applicable
Learn more about Estate Planning Support →
A retirement plan from us looks like this:
Discovery. What does your ideal retirement look like? When? Where? With whom? What lifestyle? What's non-negotiable, and what's flexible?
Current state. What do you have? Income, savings, debts, investments, corporate assets, pensions, government benefits. Both spouses if applicable. Both personal and corporate sides if applicable.
Modeling. Project the funded path under your current trajectory and various alternatives. Test different retirement ages, withdrawal strategies, CPP/OAS timing, contribution mixes, inflation assumptions.
Written plan. A document that lays out the strategy, the assumptions, the recommendations, and the framework for review. Yours to keep, review, and reference.
Implementation. Setting up the structures the plan calls for — contributions, restructuring, insurance, IPP if applicable, banking, etc.
Annual reviews. Updating the plan as your situation, the rules, and the market change. Retirement planning is ongoing work, not a one-time event.
For most clients, building the initial comprehensive plan takes 6-10 weeks from first meeting to written plan delivered. Annual reviews after that are typically 60-90 minutes.
A few situations where retirement plans run into trouble — usually because of things that could have been addressed earlier:
Started saving too late. No structure makes up for not enough years of accumulation. Earlier matters.
Never coordinated the personal and corporate sides. Two sets of advisors, two strategies, no integration, and significant inefficiency that compounds over decades.
Locked into investment products that don't fit retirement. Restrictive structures, high fees, illiquidity at the wrong time.
Assumed inflation would stay low. Plans built on 2% inflation assumptions need re-stress-testing.
Treated CPP and OAS as default-take-at-65. Often the wrong answer; sometimes the right one. The choice should be deliberate.
No drawdown strategy. Withdrawals happening in whatever order is convenient instead of in tax-optimized order.
Lifestyle creep into retirement. Spending plans built on pre-retirement income that don't account for the absence of working income.
Estate considerations ignored. Wealth that won't be fully consumed in retirement deserves planning so it transfers efficiently rather than gets taxed away.
We see most of these. Some are correctable mid-stream; some are easier to avoid than to fix. The earlier the planning starts, the cleaner the outcome.
Depends entirely on what you want retirement to look like, where you'll live, how long retirement is expected to last, what other income sources are in place, and how much risk you're willing to take with investments. Generic rules of thumb ("25 times annual spending," "$1M is enough") miss too many variables. The honest answer for most clients is: it depends — and the only way to know is to model the actual numbers for your specific situation. Plans typically project to age 90 or 95 for longevity safety; some plans stress-test to 100.
Earlier than people typically do. Comprehensive retirement planning becomes most valuable in your 40s and 50s — far enough out that adjustments still compound, close enough that you have meaningful accumulation to model around. Younger clients (20s and 30s) often benefit from planning principles more than detailed retirement projections — get the savings habits, account structure, and basic strategy right, then layer detailed retirement planning on top as you get closer.
Yes, and the value is different from "they'll pick your investments." A financial planner or insurance broker working in this capacity covers strategy, structure, tax integration, retirement projections, insurance review, and ongoing coordination. Investment selection can be self-directed within that framework if you prefer. Some of our clients are sophisticated self-directed investors who use us for everything except picking the individual stocks and ETFs in their accounts.
They have their place for basic situations. The limitations show up with anything that involves corporate structures, multi-decade tax optimization, complex family situations, integrated insurance and estate strategy, or active coordination with other professionals. For incorporated professionals especially, robo-advisors and free planning tools can't model the full picture — they don't have visibility into the corporate side. A real planning relationship adds the most value where the situation has more moving parts than a generic tool can handle.
Early retirement is feasible but requires more planning. Key considerations: bridging income from your retirement date until CPP/OAS eligibility, accelerated drawdown on registered accounts (with the corresponding tax implications), healthcare and group benefits coverage (gone with the job), and longevity risk (longer retirement = larger nest egg required). For incorporated professionals considering early retirement, the corporate side often provides important flexibility — keeping the corporation open during early-retirement years can be a useful bridge.
No. CPP and OAS decisions are individual. A common strategy for couples is to have one spouse take CPP earlier (often the spouse with lower CPP entitlement) while the other defers to age 70 (often the spouse with higher entitlement and longer expected life). The deferral builds a meaningful guaranteed income stream for whichever spouse outlives the other. We model the alternatives for couples specifically.
Hard to put a number on it, but the rough answer is "considerably more than it costs." For a typical incorporated professional, the difference between a default approach and an optimized retirement strategy can run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars over a 20-30 year retirement. For an employee with a more standard set of accounts, the difference is smaller but still real — often tens of thousands over the same period. The bigger value is usually peace of mind: knowing the plan works and being able to retire (or stay retired) without second-guessing whether the money will last.
At least annually as part of an ongoing review. More often when something material changes — retirement date shifts, large inheritance, divorce, sale of business, significant market movements, major tax legislation changes. The plan you build at 50 isn't the same plan you need at 60, and the plan you need at 60 isn't the plan that gets you through 75. Retirement planning is ongoing maintenance, not a one-time setup.
Whether you're 30 years from retirement and want to set the trajectory right, or 5 years away and want to make sure the wind-down strategy is dialed in, the value of a written retirement plan compounds with the years remaining. Reach out and we'll start the conversation. No pressure, no pitch.